From
Susan Kniep, President
The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations,
Inc. (FCTO)
(860) 841-8032
fctopresident@ctact.org or fctopresident@aol.com
Website: ctact.org
February 6,
2005
The following Op Ed, written by Susan Kniep,
President of FCTO, appeared in the Waterbury
Republican today.
TOUGH CHOICES ON LABOR COSTS
AWAIT
BUDGET MAKERS
Governor Rell and
Legislators Must Fix the Widening Divide
They Have Created Between "At-Will"
Private-Sector Employees
and Government -Sector
Union Employees
With Budget Season upon us and taxpayers facing a $1.3
billion State budget deficit,
Governor Rell and all State legislators
would be wise to freeze the salaries of all state employees, to include their
own. They should also extend the legal
authority to freeze salaries to municipal leaders, while instituting changes to
the state’s Binding Arbitration laws.
Understanding that leadership must come from the top,
Governor Rell, in her continued effort to bring
Connecticut out from under the cloud of corruption, should concurrently dismiss
many Rowland political appointees making unjustifiable salaries who will soon
be ready to retire at the taxpayer’s expense.
These durational hires, some of whom were moved into permanent
positions, include Rowland loyalists Kathleen Mengacci,
paid $85,000 a year as assistant to the director of the Office of Workforce
Competitiveness; Regina Gianni, paid $52,000 who answers phones for the
Department of Motor Vehicles; Michael Doyle, paid $60,000 as an executive
assistant in the Department of Correction; and Martin Zito,
paid $104,000 as chief of staff in the Department of Mental Retardation.
Next, Governor Rell would do
well to purge the State’s quasi-public agencies of appointees who are managing
these agencies as political fiefdoms. CRRA’s loss of $220 million is history. What’s new is the revelation of the Lottery
Corp’s double-digit "incentive payments" totaling $160,926 to 17
lottery officials.
This should then be followed by Governor Rell’s termination of gubernatorial appointees to the MDC Commission who supported
William DiBella’s hand picked political operative to
a $110,000 MDC job without posting the job, while creating for his friend an
assistant position at over $70,000. The
Governor and all State elected officials should
join former Democrat State Chairman George Jepsen’s
call for DiBella to step down from his position as
Chairman of the MDC to avoid, as Jepsen stated, “the appearance of impropriety, after
allegations by federal authorities that he accepted nearly $375,000 in a deal
involving now imprisoned former Treasurer Paul Sylvester.”
And, finally, Governor Rell and
all State legislators must fix the widening divide they have created between
“at-will” private sector employees and government sector union employees. We have a two tiered employment system in Connecticut between the
haves and have nots.
Government sector unions who have the elected officials wrapped around
their finger, and as such, they refuse to change state Binding Arbitration laws versus “at-will”
employees who are trying to pry the fingers of their elected officials from
their wallets as more of their tax dollars are channeled to fund union
contracts, which account for 70% to 90% of local budgets.
The majority of Connecticut
residents work in the private sector under “at-will” conditions wherein they
can be terminated at any time, for any legal reason, or for no reason at all by
their employer. They work in a state
of flux knowing that their employer on any given day can demand that they pay a
greater share of their health care premium, take on a greater workload, receive
a minimal salary increase, no salary increase or have their pay cut. There will be no debate, no bargaining, no
arbitration, and no elected official waiting to defend them. The words “out-sourcing” and “visas” have
become a part of the Connecticut
worker’s vocabulary as the agenda of many corporations is to put their stock at
the top of the portfolios of Wall Street analysts.
The “at-will” employee is an unprotected class. They are losing their jobs, their homes and
their health insurance. They are being
forced into jobs which are below their educational and skill levels and at
salaries which are a fraction of what their previous jobs paid.
Yet, the American dream is alive and well for those whom
the “at-will” employee is forced by elected government officials to financially
support. They are the state and
municipal government workers. In
contrast to the “at–will” employee, government workers don’t have to accept
what their employer tells them.
Taxpayers are their employer.
Whether it is working conditions or salary, healthcare or pension issues
they exercise their State given right to force negotiations and push their
agendas, behind closed doors, under state Binding Arbitration laws, which leave
taxpayers powerless. Unions vote to
accept or reject their contracts.
Taxpayers do not. Instead,
taxpayers are simply presented with the bill for these lucrative union
contracts, through their property taxes.
State elected officials like Edith Prague, Chairperson of
the State’s Labor Committee, and her Democrat colleagues, work to protect the
interests of government employees to the
detriment of “at-will” private sector employees. She opposes any changes to State Binding
Arbitration Laws. She refuses to support
proposed changes being brought before the full General Assembly.
Throughout the 169 Connecticut
towns, 70% to 90% of municipal budgets pay for salaries, health care and
pensions of municipal employees. In
several Connecticut
towns, pensions for personnel are determined by what they earned in three of
their final five years on the job, with overtime factored in. In Hartford,
a wage earner took home $131,706.46, or $71,533.14
more than his base salary. In East Hartford, police can elected a program which will
allow them to work 5 years prior to full retirement. While collecting their pay, 96% of their
pension is deposited into a savings account up to 5 years. With pensions at $50,000 and greater, they
can leave the town with $250,000 and more if they elect this program, and then
begin collecting their full pension.
The Wall Street Journal on January 13 in their article
“No Teacher Left Behind”
labeled the Teachers Union as
the most powerful in the country contending they promote their own interests to
the detriment of public school systems.”
Yet, our State and local elected officials continue to oppose any form
of competition in education to include vouchers.
Volunteerism, once a noble cause, has been trampled on by
union leadership, whose power is
cemented in State law. Firefighters
working in towns and cities throughout the State were forced to incorporate a
provision in their labor contracts which prohibited them from volunteering for
fire fighter duties in the towns in which they lived.
State taxpayers pay approximately $300 million for State
employee healthcare and $155 million for State retiree healthcare. Some state and local retirees pay little to
nothing. Locally, property taxes are
increasing to pay the
85% to 95% of healthcare premiums for municipal employees. This equates to taxpayers paying between $12,750 to $14,250 for each union member’s family
healthcare policy . But that wasn’t
enough for the unions. They wanted more
and went to court to get it. They sued
the taxpayers to take possession of the $100 million in stock received by the
State from the Anthem demutualization, as well as the Anthem stock distributed
to individual towns. Many “at-will”
workers in Connecticut
who pay taxes have no health insurance.
In summary, the increasing divide between “at-will”
employees in the private sector versus government sector unions must be
immediately addressed through changes to State Binding Arbitration Laws. The cost of union contracts has helped Connecticut to attain our status
as the highest taxed state per capita in the nation, with the highest bonded
debt. Out debt is $12.4 billion, which
taxpayers pay $1.3 million in interest annually.
State costs can be brought under control. If our elected officials don’t have the
wisdom or courage to do so, then we, the taxpayers, are at fault for electing
them.